Fonte: Revista Turismo Estudos e Práticas - RTEP/UERN; No. 1 (2020): GEPLAT: Caderno Suplementar; 1-14
Palavras-chave:
Resumo: By focusing on differences between Islamic and common management, present paper attempts to study “goal” issue in both approaches and represent theoretical objective pattern in Islamic management. By studying Islam, liberalism and socialism as the communicators with practical experience in establishing political systems, it has expounded the difference of their attitudes toward human being and its destination, their doctrine and Palladian pillars in management arena, base and two destinations of felicity or adversity these two aspects. Present study has attempted to represent a paradigmatic pattern on goal theory in Islamic management by using databased theory and community consisting of 27 Islamic sources as Islamic management cognitive resources. The findings indicate that despite of some similarities in this ambit, there are basic differences between these two approaches in content and method of “goal” issue. In western common management, the manager and personnel are both human beings who serve organization (as asset holders) for purpose of gaining benefit and more enjoy in passing life and all planning in this kind of management is toward deficit and discriminatory securement of human material world. Be Islamic governance at its government level and its organizations as the intermediary between man and God, in aspects like God central, perfection-seeking, security central, law central, right central, God moral central, knowledge central, unity central, deny ignominy special, dignified independence central, construction central, God correction central providing the field to human proximity to its creator and eternal happiness.
